Well, I've done some work on some TV shows and feature films for audio work. This was just a natural extension of that. Doing things computer based, we're sort of doing a streamlined post-production process. Instead of taking our zillion of elements in a non-linear environment, we work with the final versions. That means flattening the video down to the final cut, and flattening the audio from 200+ tracks(many being FX tracks) down to a stereo downmix.
But in all seriousness, Easy Show is that easy. I'm taking a ton of experience acquired over my lifetime and adapting it to work in this environment. Since I'm the Tech God for this show, I get to make a lot of decisions. In this case, it was coming up with a total end to end solution.
I'm not saying EasyShow is perfect. it's not depending on what you want to do. For example, the director started slapping new elements into the timeline at the beginning. I said "oh no, we can't do that or it will trash everything I have done, move it to the end". That's just ignorance on their part. But for the shows I'm working on for the most part like this, it's an ideal match. This product was ideally made for not only this type of show, but with carefull planning, functions perfectly with how the show works for the rehearsals AND productions.
We're complicating things be having the director be front and center, while "master control" is off to the side. It's a necessity. It also adds a layer of complication and high risk by betting it all on a 50-foot MIDI cable that has to run across an aisle!
But back to picking this up on my own, it really was easy. There's not a whole lot of necessary options. Make sure your imported video works, then make sure your received timecode is in the correct format. If you can do that, you're going to get good results.
Let's put it this way: a show is no time to take risks. I tested Easy Show as I went and it took me a long time to do the programming. I did incrementical tests of both the programming AND technology to break it or find problems. I felt VERY comfortable risking it all on this show. In fact, I didn't feel it was a risk at all. For 2 different shows, it worked FLAWLESS. Thanks to timecode, it also allowed the lights to work PERFECT and the side projections went exactly where they needed to be in the timeline. Granted, the side projections ran off a second program, but I could have just as easily had Compu Show run that bit. But MY EasyShow monitor was full of my notes for the spot ops and other stuff.
Now, if you're doing this all on one machine, this is actually OK to do with Sonar and Compu Show/Easy 3D/Easy Show all running at once. Sony vegas Pro 10 is a resource pig and is wasteful and ineffecient in multiple ways in regards to how it handles video on the fly, even when not running FX or plug ins for the video. Sonar is an audio package and as such, tends to not bog down unless you're pushing your hardware past what it was intended to handle. But, you will need to loop a short MIDI cable from a MIDI OUT to a MIDI IN. You can either make the cables or buy pre-made ones. Sweetwater makes some really nice 1-foot cables with a lifetime warranty. Helps reduce some cable clutter! Sonar will need to send MTC OUT on a specific MIDI OUT(user defined) and Easy Show will need to read input from a MIDI input(also user defined(, so its best to have a MIDI interface with multiple ins and outs. 2 at least, such as a MIDISPORT 2X2, but if you want more, hey, then make sure your needs are justified as the costs jump up. A MIDISPORT 4X4 runs around $150, while a 2X2 is around $60, and a UNO is around $40. MOTU makes some 8X8 nes, but those are gonna run quite a bit more. I'm not a MOTU fan, but I'm not here to slam them. Almost all the multiple bank MIDI interfaces let you pick and choose what ports you want to use. Just make sure whatever you want to use with Compu Show/Easy Show, you need to pay attention. Compu Show wants dedicated input ports for it's triggering and control. Easy Show also wants a dedicated input port for receiving timecode. This necessitates at least a 2X2 interface configuration. But you just burned all your inputs, so what if you wanted to run that extra video thing I do? The cost difference between a 3X3 and the 4X4 says "dude, just get the 4X4". And if you need the timecode in multiple areas, you need a MIDI thru box to send that incoming timecode into multiple outputs. I know it sounds crazy to add all this sort of stuff even if doing this on one machine, but it's a possible necessity. You have to evaluate your needs and requirements and them make wise decisions as to how you're going to make it happen. It doesn't need to break the bank, but it will require some smart spending, some patience and knowing where you can get certain items. The biggest issues to NOT wait until it's almost showtime. Get this crap done in adcance.
Having a background in high-end and highly complex studio and live situations is very useful. I've not only had to use them, but then design them as well.
Getting to use Compu Show in a LIVE environment took a solid 4 months of me working my tail off, learning as I went, getting help when I could. While I haven't recouped my investment yet, the product showed that it's worth the time, does what it says and despite the hard up front work, made showtime a lot less stressful so I could focus on other things.